<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2007-11-15</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wmhartnett.com/2007/11/15/links-for-2007-11-15/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wmhartnett.com/2007/11/15/links-for-2007-11-15/</link>
	<description>Journalism, the future of news, and cat pictures.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:59:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digidave</title>
		<link>http://www.wmhartnett.com/2007/11/15/links-for-2007-11-15/comment-page-1/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>Digidave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 10:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wmhartnett.com/2007/11/15/links-for-2007-11-15/#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yikes. Could the community have done St. Pete’s wetlands project by informing each other?&quot;

For one -- this might be taking the quote a bit out of context. I&#039;m not saying journalists should abondon reporting all together. 

Nor do I think citizen journalists can come together to build an intricate website like this: http://www.sptimes.com/2006/webspecials06/wetlands/

But I do think that a large part of the information within that website could have been gathered by citizen journalism. Would it have been presented as beautifully. No. Without a doubt. Is there added value by having a prof. go out and do reporting - of course. But the job description is changing -- and I think part of it is playing the role of educator rather than reporter - helping citizens inform each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yikes. Could the community have done St. Pete’s wetlands project by informing each other?&#8221;</p>
<p>For one &#8212; this might be taking the quote a bit out of context. I&#8217;m not saying journalists should abondon reporting all together. </p>
<p>Nor do I think citizen journalists can come together to build an intricate website like this: <a href="http://www.sptimes.com/2006/webspecials06/wetlands/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sptimes.com/2006/webspecials06/wetlands/</a></p>
<p>But I do think that a large part of the information within that website could have been gathered by citizen journalism. Would it have been presented as beautifully. No. Without a doubt. Is there added value by having a prof. go out and do reporting &#8211; of course. But the job description is changing &#8212; and I think part of it is playing the role of educator rather than reporter &#8211; helping citizens inform each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 4.557 seconds -->
